boardseeker.com page fold previous page next page
 
 

David vs. Goliath

Read

 

Kauli Seadi Interview

Read

 

Olympic Boards

Read

         

A New Board is Born


 

World wide, there are currently 2 very strong racing classes. The first is Formula Windsurfing which is going from strength to strength at the moment with almost 140 competitors at the recent European Championships. The other is Olympic One Design racing using the antiquated Mistral IMCO but still very popular due to its Olympic status.

Formula tends to attract the ‘superstars’ such as Steve Allen, Antoine Albeau, Kevin Prichard and Micah Buzianis etc whilst IMCO tends to attract the full support of National Governing bodies (such as the RYA) in their bid to support Olympic Class disciplines.

     

   
  FORMULA IMCO
Established: 1999 1986
Ideal sailor weight: 85kg 68kg
Equipment limitations: 3 sails, 1 board, 70cm fin Standard board and 7.4m rig
Racing wind range: 9-25 knots 3-30 knots
Advantages: Planing action in light winds Racing in all conditions
Drawbacks: Cant race in under 9 knots Dated design doesn’t plane early
Superstars: Steve Allen, Antoine Albeau, Micah Buzianis Nikos Kaklamanakas, Chris Sieber, Przemek Miarczynski
Approx. prize money at International event: £12,000 None
Approx. income of top UK racer: £15,000 £25,000
     

THE PROBLEM

The problem is that both disciplines are at extremes and not at all related to the type of sailing that most windsurfers do. IMCO requires sub 70kg endurance athletes who can pump their way around a race course in an abundance of light and marginal racing conditions (due to having to compete at sailing venues). Formula requires 85kg ‘power sailors’ who can hold a 12.5m sail sheeted in for 30minutes around a course in 15-20knots of wind. Formula can’t race until the wind is above 9 knots and IMCO racers don’t stop pumping their way around the course until the wind is over 15 knots!

So November 2004 is time for a change as the new Olympic board is selected for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing. The decision of which board to change to, is ultimately made by the International governing body for sailing – ISAF. To help them make a choice, they hold an ‘Evaluation Trials’ where manufacturers can supply their proposals.

 

     

We went to Lake Garda in May to check out the candidates at the trials. This is what we saw...

THE TRIALS

  • 5 day testing event in Lake Garda with 16 selected sailors to test the current designs and give their input from the perspective of different countries, disciplines and sizes.
  • Each day, each sailor is given 45 minutes to free sail on the board and then they take part in a race to test its speed.
  • Rigs were provided by Neilpryde (RS 4), Gaastra (GTX), North (Imco 7.4 and 8.4) and Prodigy rig 8.5m on which to test the boards.


 

Sails were being evaluated although the focus was on the boards. It was noted that the sails with fewer cams were much lighter in the hands and pumped much better in non planning condition but didn’t have the drive to really perform in planing conditions on formula boards. More development needs to go into the sails as the general consensus was that they are not good enough for all-round performance.

THE TRIALISTS

     

Mistral One Design (Standard)

Standard Mistral One Design supplied as a benchmark with the standard 7.4m IMCO sail.

Length: 374
Fin: 34
Weight: 15.4kg
Volume 235l
Idea Sail: 7.4m

Testers comments: “A proven design that is capable of performing in all wind strengths but now lacks the planning performance offered by wider and shorter boards with bigger rigs.”
 
Mistral One Design (Standard)
     
     


Mistral One Design (Improved)

 

Mistral One Design (Improved) – Olympic Design

Daggerboard and fin size have been increased slightly to cater for the proposed sail size increase to 8.4m.

Length: 374
Fin: 40
Weight: 13.9kg
Volume 235l
Idea Sail: 8.5m

Testers comments: “A bit more lively than the standard Mistral One Design but still not matching the planning performances of ‘modern’ shaped boards.”
     
     

Mistral Prodigy

The Mistral prodigy is a tried and tested design. Has a very successful racing circuit in the US. Relatively heavy, but lighter construction will mean a much higher price tag. Works almost as well as the IMCO in non planning conditions but is a real struggle when it gets windy as it is so heavy. The extra weight prevents the board from accelerating and instead causes a lot of pull from the rig.

Fin: 50
Weight: 15kg
Volume 225l
Idea Sail: 8.5m

Testers comments: “Too heavy! It could be really good if it was a few kilos lighter. When it gets windy the board doesn’t accelerate causing the sailor to struggle too much with the rig.”

 


Mistral Prodigy

     
     


Starboard 1 (Z Class)

 

Starboard 1 (Z Class)

The first of the 3 Starboards has a full length retractable daggerboard and sliding mast track and a V nose similar to a Lechner. Unfortunately the prototype was very heavy at the detriment of performance.

Fin: 70
Weight: 15.5kg
Volume 195l
Idea Sail: 11m

Testers comments: “The board worked quite well in both light and strong winds. It wasn’t outstanding but did the job it needed to. A few kilos lighter would probably make a huge difference to its strong wind performance.”
     
     

Starboard 2 (Z Class)

The second Starboard has less of a V nose and is shaped a bit more like a formula board. It has a daggerboard and sliding mast track, but the daggerboard does not retract. It simply lifts up out of the cassette and is then stored in a channel on the deck until needed again. This has two advantages. The daggerboard can be longer as it doesn’t have to avoid the fin when retracted back and secondly the board is more efficient at speed because the slot for the daggerboard is much smaller.

Fin: 70cm
Weight: Approx 14kg
Volume Approx 180l
Idea Sail: 11m

Testers comments: “Very poor in light winds because it doesn’t rail or track straight. Moving daggerboard with your hand is not practical. Could also be dropped as its not fastened to the board. Problem in gusty conditions as you have to stop to move the dagger up and down.”
 


Starboard 2 (Z Class)

     
     


Neilpryde

 

Neilpryde

Neilpryde produced one of the most finished looking designs of the trials with a fairly standard formula board looking very similar to last years AHD. The board was equipped with an 80cm fin, 10cm bigger than currently allowed in formula, with the aim of boosting light wind performance.

Fin: 80
Weight: 8.5kg
Volume 165-170l
Idea Sail: up to 12.5m

Testers comments: “Fairly standard formula board performance. Bigger fin made a small difference in the very light winds and strong wind performance was excellent. Problem was that you need 7-8 knots to plane and 8-9 knots to make decent upwind progress.”

     
     

Gaastra

Gaastra were at the trials to promote their rigs more than the boards. As such they submitted a Starboard formula board painted white as their proposal.

Fin: 70
Weight: 8.2kg
Idea Sail: 11m

Testers comments: “Again, a standard Formula board with great strong wind performance but no good for sub 8 knot racing.”
 


Gaastra

     
     


Boards and Less

 

Boards and Less

This board defied both convention and belief. It was submitted by a Canadian company by the name of Boards And Less headed by front man Cam Rawlinson (also referred to as the mad professor)! The board certainly had plenty of innovation but perhaps the empty drinks bottle attached to the daggerboard for floatation and the duct tape holding the detachable nose on indicated a slight lack of refinement! The fact that it was heavier than a heard of elephants made it a bit of a lottery whether it was going to float or sink at any point!

Specifications are all a bit sketchy (unlike the design itself obviously!)

Testers comments: “Not going on it because my life insurance isn’t good enough! Was used this morning as a Kayak to paddle around the lake. You take the dagger out and put it over your shoulder but it is a 70cm carbon fin which dangles around your ankles, very dangerous! It has a bottle on it that prevents it sinking if you drop it…”
     
     

Exocet (Flying Fish)

With the exception of the Mistral One Designs, this was probably the most ‘long board’ orientated of the lot. A big bulbous bow (very similar to the old Lechner design) boosts non planning performance whilst strong wind performance was good with the exception of all the spray that the nose churned up! It did have a very nice mast track and sliding daggerboard system.

Fin: 70
Weight: 12kg
Volume 280l
Ideal Sail: 11m

Testers comments: “In light winds it performs well and is good to pump and tracks well upwind. In strong winds, you sail it like a long board with mast track fwd and dagger down. Downwind in light winds it is just like a normal longboard. In strong winds it is quite nice, sailing in the back straps and it planes quite early. But it has a tendancy to shoot off down wind and could be big trouble in waves.”
 


Exocet

     
     


PD

 

PD

The PD was supplied by Patrik Diethelm (F2 shaper) and was one of the most successful and innovative designs. It has been designed to use the attributes of a planning formula board in strong winds but also to be able to be sailed like a long board in light winds. It has a stepped under hull design with a thunder tail, sliding mastrack and retractable daggerboard. It also boasts a mini bow and chined rails.

Fin: 70
Weight: 9.5kg
Volume 180l
Idea Sail: 11m

Testers comments: “In light winds it struggled upwind. Downwind it was relatively hard to pump as it was very unstable. In strong winds it was great upwind when planning and acted just like a formula board. Could be developed and the rig is very important. The rig we used did not do the board justice”
     
     

RESULTS

The results of the trials have now been evaluated and the conclusions of the committee were:

The trials showed that neither current Longboards nor current Formula boards are ideal for future Olympic competition.

  • Current Longboards do not reflect current trends in windsurfing and do not excite the sailors. If they remain the Olympic equipment then windsurfing as a racing discipline will continue to decline.
  • Current Formula boards are not suitable for sailing in the full range of racing wind strengths found at Olympic class regattas, and have not yet been designed with such racing in mind.

However the trials showed that a new “Hybrid” racing board, with exciting planing performance, can sail upwind effectively in 5 knots. Four Hybrid prototypes, and one existing production Hybrid board, were evaluated. While none was 100% satisfactory, they excited the sailors, they suit a wider weight range of sailor, and the designs can be refined in the short term to meet all the requirements of a new Olympic board. Some believe that further Formula development may also enable Formula boards to race in light winds, and this development should also be encouraged.

Similarly rig development has to-date focused on meeting either the requirement of Longboard racing or of Formula sailing. The new Hybrid racing boards will stimulate the development of rigs that are suitable for racing upwind and off-wind in both light and strong winds.

CONCLUSIONS

So how does this all affect windsurfing as a sport? I had a conversation in Garda with Sven Rasmussen (Owner of Starboard) to get his thoughts on the situation:

“I think that the X Class (X Class is Starboards name for the Hybrid) is the best way forward for windsurfing. Increased participation is the main aim. Formula is too difficult for the majority of people. The sails are too big and the boards don’t work when they are not planning.

With the X Class, sail sizes will be reduced so that more people can sail with them and boards will work in virtually any wind strength. Ideally we will have a situation where every manufacturer can produce a hybrid design of their own. The shapes will be frozen for the duration of the Olympic cycle. This will ensure that all the manufactures, importers, shops and team riders will be behind it. There will also be stability of design which will encourage more participants.”

In fact, it might not be too far away before one board could potentially be produced in several constructions and used by beginner’s right through to Olympic contenders. This would allow more people to get involved in competition without the extreme costs and perhaps more importantly without the specialist techniques required to use today’s race winning equipment. It’s got to be good!

Stop Press!

ISAF have just announced that the next Olympic board is likely to be a Hybrid. They have instructed manufacturers to produce a design matching the criteria below for testing at an evaluation event in Southampton (UK) in September (16th–19th):

HULL
Hull Length: 2650 - 3100mm
Hull Width: 790 - 1000mm
Hull Weight: Minimum 12 kg (including mast track, excluding foils and straps)

FOILS
Tail fin depth: 700mm (provisional)
Centreboard depth: 850mm Max.
Sail Size: Men 10 sqM (provisional), Women 8.5 sqM (provisional)

Article by Adrian Jones.

 



 


 
   
   
   
  Top of page