| |
David vs. Goliath
Read
|
|
Kauli Seadi Interview
Read
|
|
Olympic Boards
Read
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A New Board is Born

|
|
World wide, there are currently
2 very strong racing classes. The first is Formula
Windsurfing which is going from strength to strength
at the moment with almost 140 competitors at the
recent European Championships. The other is Olympic
One Design racing using the antiquated Mistral IMCO
but still very popular due to its Olympic status.
Formula tends to attract the ‘superstars’ such
as Steve Allen, Antoine Albeau, Kevin Prichard and
Micah Buzianis etc whilst IMCO tends to attract the
full support of National Governing bodies (such as
the RYA) in their bid to support Olympic Class disciplines.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FORMULA |
IMCO |
| Established: |
1999 |
1986 |
| Ideal sailor
weight: |
85kg |
68kg |
| Equipment limitations: |
3 sails, 1 board,
70cm fin |
Standard board
and 7.4m rig |
| Racing wind range: |
9-25
knots |
3-30
knots |
| Advantages: |
Planing
action in light winds |
Racing
in all conditions |
| Drawbacks: |
Cant
race in under 9 knots |
Dated
design doesn’t plane early |
| Superstars: |
Steve
Allen, Antoine Albeau, Micah Buzianis |
Nikos
Kaklamanakas, Chris Sieber, Przemek Miarczynski |
| Approx. prize
money at International event: |
£12,000 |
None |
| Approx. income
of top UK racer: |
£15,000 |
£25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
THE PROBLEM
The problem is
that both disciplines are at extremes and not at
all related to the type of sailing that most windsurfers
do. IMCO requires sub 70kg endurance athletes who
can pump their way around a race course in an abundance
of light and marginal racing conditions (due to having
to compete at sailing venues). Formula requires 85kg ‘power
sailors’ who can hold a 12.5m sail sheeted
in for 30minutes around a course in 15-20knots of
wind. Formula can’t race until the wind is
above 9 knots and IMCO racers don’t stop pumping
their way around the course until the wind is over
15 knots!
So November 2004 is time for a change as the new
Olympic board is selected for the 2008 Olympics
in Beijing. The decision of which board to change
to, is ultimately made by the International governing
body for sailing – ISAF. To help them make
a choice, they hold an ‘Evaluation Trials’ where
manufacturers can supply their proposals. |
|

|
| |
|
|
We went to Lake Garda in May to check out the candidates
at the trials. This is what we saw...
THE TRIALS
- 5 day testing event in Lake Garda with 16 selected
sailors to test the current designs and give their input
from the perspective of different countries, disciplines
and sizes.
- Each day, each sailor is given 45 minutes to free
sail on the board and then they take part in a race to
test its speed.
- Rigs were provided by Neilpryde (RS 4), Gaastra (GTX),
North (Imco 7.4 and 8.4) and Prodigy rig 8.5m on which
to test the boards.

|
|
Sails were being evaluated although
the focus was on the boards. It was noted that the
sails with fewer cams were much lighter in the hands
and pumped much better in non planning condition
but didn’t have the drive to really perform
in planing conditions on formula boards. More development
needs to go into the sails as the general consensus
was that they are not good enough for all-round
performance.
|
THE TRIALISTS
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Mistral One Design (Standard)
Standard Mistral One Design supplied as a benchmark
with the standard 7.4m IMCO sail.
Length: 374
Fin: 34
Weight: 15.4kg
Volume 235l
Idea Sail: 7.4m
Testers comments: “A proven design that is
capable of performing in all wind strengths but now
lacks the planning performance offered by wider and
shorter boards with bigger rigs.” |
|

Mistral One Design (Standard)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

Mistral One Design
(Improved)
|
|
Mistral One Design (Improved) – Olympic
Design
Daggerboard and fin size have been increased
slightly to cater for the proposed sail size increase
to 8.4m.
Length: 374
Fin: 40
Weight: 13.9kg
Volume 235l
Idea Sail: 8.5m
Testers comments: “A bit more lively than the
standard Mistral One Design but still not matching
the planning performances of ‘modern’ shaped
boards.” |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Mistral Prodigy
The Mistral prodigy is a tried and tested design.
Has a very successful racing circuit in the US.
Relatively heavy, but lighter construction will
mean a much higher price tag. Works almost as well
as the IMCO in non planning conditions but is a
real struggle when it gets windy as it is so heavy.
The extra weight prevents the board from accelerating
and instead causes a lot of pull from the rig.
Fin: 50
Weight: 15kg
Volume 225l
Idea Sail: 8.5m
Testers comments: “Too heavy! It could
be really good if it was a few kilos lighter. When
it gets windy the board doesn’t accelerate
causing the sailor to struggle too much with the
rig.” |
|

Mistral Prodigy
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

Starboard 1 (Z Class)
|
|
Starboard 1 (Z Class)
The first of the 3 Starboards has a full length
retractable daggerboard and sliding mast track
and a V nose similar to a Lechner. Unfortunately
the prototype was very heavy at the detriment of
performance.
Fin: 70
Weight: 15.5kg
Volume 195l
Idea Sail: 11m
Testers comments: “The board worked quite well
in both light and strong winds. It wasn’t outstanding
but did the job it needed to. A few kilos lighter
would probably make a huge difference to its strong
wind performance.” |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Starboard 2 (Z Class)
The second Starboard has less of a V nose and
is shaped a bit more like a formula board. It has
a daggerboard and sliding mast track, but the daggerboard
does not retract. It simply lifts up out of the
cassette and is then stored in a channel on the
deck until needed again. This has two advantages.
The daggerboard can be longer as it doesn’t
have to avoid the fin when retracted back and secondly
the board is more efficient at speed because the
slot for the daggerboard is much smaller.
Fin: 70cm
Weight: Approx 14kg
Volume Approx 180l
Idea Sail: 11m
Testers comments: “Very poor in light winds
because it doesn’t rail or track straight.
Moving daggerboard with your hand is not practical.
Could also be dropped as its not fastened to the
board. Problem in gusty conditions as you have to
stop to move the dagger up and down.” |
|

Starboard 2 (Z Class)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

Neilpryde
|
|
Neilpryde
Neilpryde produced one of the most finished looking
designs of the trials with a fairly standard formula
board looking very similar to last years AHD. The
board was equipped with an 80cm fin, 10cm bigger
than currently allowed in formula, with the aim
of boosting light wind performance.
Fin: 80
Weight: 8.5kg
Volume 165-170l
Idea Sail: up to 12.5m
Testers comments: “Fairly standard formula
board performance. Bigger fin made a small difference
in the very light winds and strong wind performance
was excellent. Problem was that you need 7-8 knots
to plane and 8-9 knots to make decent upwind progress.” |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Gaastra
Gaastra were at the trials to promote their rigs
more than the boards. As such they submitted a
Starboard formula board painted white as their
proposal.
Fin: 70
Weight: 8.2kg
Idea Sail: 11m
Testers comments: “Again, a standard Formula
board with great strong wind performance but no good
for sub 8 knot racing.” |
|

Gaastra
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

Boards and Less
|
|
Boards and Less
This board defied both convention and belief.
It was submitted by a Canadian company by the name
of Boards And Less headed by front man Cam Rawlinson
(also referred to as the mad professor)! The board
certainly had plenty of innovation but perhaps
the empty drinks bottle attached to the daggerboard
for floatation and the duct tape holding the detachable
nose on indicated a slight lack of refinement!
The fact that it was heavier than a heard of elephants
made it a bit of a lottery whether it was going
to float or sink at any point!
Specifications are all a bit sketchy (unlike
the design itself obviously!)
Testers comments: “Not going on it because
my life insurance isn’t good enough! Was used
this morning as a Kayak to paddle around the lake.
You take the dagger out and put it over your shoulder
but it is a 70cm carbon fin which dangles around
your ankles, very dangerous! It has a bottle on it
that prevents it sinking if you drop it…” |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Exocet (Flying Fish)
With the exception of the Mistral One Designs,
this was probably the most ‘long board’ orientated
of the lot. A big bulbous bow (very similar to
the old Lechner design) boosts non planning performance
whilst strong wind performance was good with the
exception of all the spray that the nose churned
up! It did have a very nice mast track and sliding
daggerboard system.
Fin: 70
Weight: 12kg
Volume 280l
Ideal Sail: 11m
Testers comments: “In light winds it performs
well and is good to pump and tracks well upwind.
In strong winds, you sail it like a long board with
mast track fwd and dagger down. Downwind in light
winds it is just like a normal longboard. In strong
winds it is quite nice, sailing in the back straps
and it planes quite early. But it has a tendancy
to shoot off down wind and could be big trouble in
waves.” |
|

Exocet
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

PD
|
|
PD
The PD was supplied by Patrik Diethelm (F2 shaper)
and was one of the most successful and innovative
designs. It has been designed to use the attributes
of a planning formula board in strong winds but
also to be able to be sailed like a long board
in light winds. It has a stepped under hull design
with a thunder tail, sliding mastrack and retractable
daggerboard. It also boasts a mini bow and chined
rails.
Fin: 70
Weight: 9.5kg
Volume 180l
Idea Sail: 11m
Testers comments: “In light winds it struggled
upwind. Downwind it was relatively hard to pump as
it was very unstable. In strong winds it was great
upwind when planning and acted just like a formula
board. Could be developed and the rig is very important.
The rig we used did not do the board justice” |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
RESULTS
The results of the trials have now been evaluated and
the conclusions of the committee were:
The trials showed that neither current Longboards nor
current Formula boards are ideal for future Olympic competition.
- Current Longboards do not reflect current trends in
windsurfing and do not excite the sailors. If they remain
the Olympic equipment then windsurfing as a racing discipline
will continue to decline.
- Current Formula boards
are not suitable for sailing in the full range of racing
wind strengths found at Olympic class regattas, and
have not yet been designed with such racing in mind.
However the trials showed that a new “Hybrid” racing
board, with exciting planing performance, can sail upwind
effectively in 5 knots. Four Hybrid prototypes, and one
existing production Hybrid board, were evaluated. While
none was 100% satisfactory, they excited the sailors, they
suit a wider weight range of sailor, and the designs can
be refined in the short term to meet all the requirements
of a new Olympic board. Some believe that further Formula
development may also enable Formula boards to race in light
winds, and this development should also be encouraged.
Similarly rig development has to-date focused on meeting
either the requirement of Longboard racing or of Formula
sailing. The new Hybrid racing boards will stimulate the
development of rigs that are suitable for racing upwind and
off-wind in both light and strong winds.
CONCLUSIONS
So how does this all affect windsurfing as
a sport? I had a conversation in Garda with Sven
Rasmussen (Owner of Starboard) to get his thoughts
on the situation:
“I think that the X Class (X Class is Starboards
name for the Hybrid) is the best way forward for
windsurfing. Increased participation is the main
aim. Formula is too difficult for the majority of
people. The sails are too big and the boards don’t
work when they are not planning.
With the X Class, sail sizes will be reduced so
that more people can sail with them and boards will
work in virtually any wind strength. Ideally we will
have a situation where every manufacturer can produce
a hybrid design of their own. The shapes will be
frozen for the duration of the Olympic cycle. This
will ensure that all the manufactures, importers,
shops and team riders will be behind it. There will
also be stability of design which will encourage
more participants.”
In fact, it might not be too far away before one board
could potentially be produced in several constructions
and used by beginner’s right through to Olympic
contenders. This would allow more people to get involved
in competition without the extreme costs and perhaps
more importantly without the specialist techniques
required to use today’s race winning equipment.
It’s got to be good! |
|
|
|
|
Stop Press!
ISAF have just announced that the next
Olympic board is likely to be a Hybrid. They
have instructed manufacturers to produce
a design matching the criteria below for
testing at an evaluation event in Southampton
(UK) in September (16th–19th):
HULL
Hull Length: 2650 - 3100mm
Hull Width: 790 - 1000mm
Hull Weight: Minimum 12 kg (including mast track, excluding foils and straps)
FOILS
Tail fin depth: 700mm (provisional)
Centreboard depth: 850mm Max.
Sail Size: Men 10 sqM (provisional), Women 8.5 sqM (provisional) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|



|
|